Fw: Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace

Received: from hotmail.com [207.68.162.100] by mail3.wilhelp.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-7.07) id A0E02C200DE; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 01:19:12 -0500
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:19:11 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [67.233.15.108]
From: "RPKinc" <rpk_inc@hotmail.com>
To: <taylor@wilhelp.com>
Subject: Fw: Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 01:18:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <DAV42ngvuE1g4U8NG7E0000f408@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2002 06:19:11.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[0FF855B0:01C21690]
X-RCPT-TO: <taylor@wilhelp.com>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 309601198

Hello Mr. Taylor,

I hope your e-mail is working!  Anyway here is a e-mail that I think Richard
Bullis may have sent me.  Man this guy really is stupid.  I can't believe
there would be anyone who would defend Bullis for real by trying to claim
you are Sanford.

If my header reading is correct, looks like Bullis is no longer on Charter
either.  I guess he lost yet another account!

----- Original Message -----
From znar@remailer.hotfire.net Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:21:50 -0700
Received: from [208.180.118.41] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBED3B76C00094136E812D0B47629A3E00; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:21:32 -0700
Received: from Compaq ([208.180.144.28]) by io.cox-internet.com
          (InterMail vK.4.03.05.03 201-232-132-103 license
180e1de7f543f89455b24e508f9cca39)
          with SMTP id <20020614221916.YCXK7217.io@Compaq>
          for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:19:16 -0500
To: rpk_inc@hotmail.com
Date: 14 Jun 2002 22:22:59 -0000
Message-ID: <ESYNBSZQ37421.7242939815@anonymous.poster>
From: bobL <00003122@no-id.com>
Subject: Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace
Comments: This message did not originate from the above address. It was
        automatically remailed by one or more anonymous mail services.
        This service is free. Please report problems or inappropriate use
        to the address below.

"Just Taylor" IS Spamford Wallace!!

Here is information on the person known as 'Just Taylor' who stalks
people he does not know into newsgroups he does not participate in
to harass and defame people for others.  He goes by a real alias.
There is NO "Taylor Jimenez" in California.  He uses abuse domains
and always posts off the record to further try to hide and avoid
accountability.  He is a triple anon coward.  There is a Sanford
Wallace and he posts from the same area as "Taylor".  "Taylor" uses
the same words (like 'larting'); behaves in the same way as Sanford;
uses some of Sanford's domains (which he claims he "bought from him");
and he is the very same age and looks exactly the same as Sanford
Wallace!!  Sanford Wallace no longer lives at his past addresses and
there is a Sanford Wallace in San Pablo, CA.  He lives in the same area
that would be served by the mail server "taylor" uses.  "Taylor" also
retaliated for  Sanford in ten different newsgroups where the "open
letter" (below) was posted.  I wonder why he would do that???

In short it is clear that "Taylor" who is an irresponsible criminal-type
stalking and harassing abuser who tries to remain unaccountable and
anonymous is indeed Sanford "Spamford" Wallace.

See the http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/jimenez_wallace.htm page.
As you can see, UNLIKE "Taylor", his critics
  go by my name and use a properly registered domain space
(registered in the name of the Jesness family for 6 years now) to host
his web pages.  They are not cowards and a psychopathic type who is
anon and uses falsely registered domains, like "Taylor".

Here is more info to get you up-to-date on this disgusting person.
Quoting past posts in response to the apparent stalking and harassment
done BY Sanford Wallace.:

An Open Letter to Sanford Wallace!


Sanford, it is obvious that you have gone to some lengths to protect
your privacy. I respect a person's privacy. But, I question
whether a person who harasses and abuses people in newsgroups he
has never even participated in deserves to remain unaccountable. It is
also questionable whether a person who provides services to others
(hypocritical others) so they can harass people should remain
unaccountable, even if your own personal posting stops. These others
you perform services for have demanded (successfully) that the very
sort of activities you do for them not occur or cease. They officially
have considered activities like you do and facilitate "stalking and
harassment". (It is possible you do not even know this because
you do not know the interactions that have occurred in the newsgroup
you abuse for and now abuse in! Afterall you have provided services
for several years to a newsgroup you just recently have appeared in
ONLY to finally do your own off-topic spam, stalking and harassment.
You do not know the newsgroup just as you do not know the people you
abuse.)

Here's the deal. You, Sanford Wallace, cease and desist with ALL
activities stalking, harassing, and abusing people and cease all
activity that facilitates and encourages harassment of individuals
promptly and your privacy will continue to be respected. Simply do
NOTHING for the others you presently "serve" that THEY would not
label as inappropriate (to say the least) IF that was done against
them. It is pathetic to see a person on a power trip, where
he does things for others because he can get away with it. Again, you
may have not even been involved enough in any interactions with the
person you harass and with those in the newsgroup you "serve" to
know that all you do would officially and definitely be considered
wrong by many of those same hypocritical people you serve (AND
SUCH ACTIVITIES _HAVE BEEN_ DECLARED WRONG BY THESE VERY PEOPLE). True,
some of the people you "serve" (as basically a cheap big-shot punk)
are happy to see YOU do what they would not do themselves because
they do not want to be seen doing wrong, yet like it when you do it.
Hopefully, this is not enough pathetic gratification for you to
continue (esp. given there will be consequence and NOT the sort you
have been hoping for). (I know how you love court and like to win
when YOU have been a supreme asshole, but that wish may not be
forthcoming. This is your record and what makes you such a disgusting
punk for the whole world. This is why Harvard voted you one of the
worst people on the earth. There ARE other possible consequences --
and whoever told you that you are "smart" was very mistaken.)

If you decide that it is more important for you to throw your
"weight" around by doing favors for people to be a big shot (punk)
and if you continue acting against people you do not know and in
newsgroups you do not participate in, I believe that it will be
fair to do anything to make you have more accountability. This
will include revealing any and all identifying information about you.
Since you have gone to some lengths to seek privacy, I believe this
is something you might not want to occur.

Things have gone forward to the point that it is no longer helpful
to you to post through an abuse domain to do your Usenet posting and
it no longer helps that you go by an alias of a person that does
not even exist (as you yourself have admitted you do). You speak
often like a greedy materialistic man who has money and likes to
throw that around for his punk-ass power trips. But you also have
your family and your privacy to consider. I suggest you stop abusing
other people and continue to keep your privacy. No one wants to take
that away from you. But, you also would have to become accountable
by all means, if you continue your stalking and harassment of people
you do not even know, in newsgroups you do not even participate in.

You have facilitated and participated in harassing activities for
years. You can still get a free pass (believe it or not). But this
offer shall expire very shortly. I'll give you a week to correct
your activities and get your activities in line with the standards
that those you serve have insisted on.


AND

THE Sanford Wallace's History of Abuse


The Internet's most notorious spammer, Sanford Wallace of Cyber
Promotions,
Inc., and other bulk e-mailers have been accused of spoofing addresses,
cloaking headers, and sending out millions of scattershot e-mails for
various
schlocky schemes and products. Now the evidence indicates that the
pathetic
abuser gets his "power trips" kicks from trying to control or extort
people
on Usenet to do what he says or what his friends say (SOooo _low_ has he
apparently sunk for 'power' and 'admiration'). Although (to gain
acceptance
and respectability) this jackass supposedly "turned against spammers"
*, he still
apparently loves to stretch the law and regulations and common sense
decency
_JUST_ to continue to practice ABUSE (or what even the majority of his
sick
supporters on Usenet would _AND HAVE_ labeled abuse). He does this to
people he does not know and for people he does not know. Just does what
he can
get away with for power and praise (from sick misguided others). SICK,
SICK,
SICK, SICHO, PSYCHOPATH.

NO ONE SHOULD EVER CONSIDER DOING BUSINESS WITH SANFORD WALLACE!!! He
is not
a decent person. Let him live off the money he already made through
his disgusting "business" activities and let him rot in hell. He will go
broke and the fat slimeball will go to hell. He is fat, ugly, and
useless.

A bit of the abuser's pathetic history is in order: Quoting
http://www.phillipsnizer.com/int-art37.htm:

"CompuServe Incorporated v. Cyber Promotions, Inc and Sanford Wallace. ,
Case No. C2-96-1070 (S.D. Ohio, Feb. 3, 1997)(Graham, J.) In this case,
the
court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants, inter alia,
from
sending unsolicited advertisements via e-mail to any CompuServe
subscriber.
Defendants are engaged in the business of sending unsolicited "junk e-
mail"
to users. On the net, this practice is referred to as "spamming."
Amongst
others, defendants sent their advertisements to subscribers of
CompuServe.
To effectuate such communications, defendants utilized CompuServe's
computer
network, where the unsolicited e-mail was stored, and the subscriber
informed
of its arrival. Subscribers thereafter had the ability to access this
mail.
Numerous subscribers complained that they did not want to receive this
e-mail. As a result, and because the volume of e-mail sent by defendants
placed a significant burden on plaintiff's computer equipment (which has
a finite processing and storage capacity), CompuServe demanded that
defendants stop sending any further e-mail. CompuServe also took
technological steps to prevent defendants' e-mail from reaching its
clientele. Defendants refused to voluntarily cease sending the e-mail,
and took steps to evade the technological blocks CompuServe had put in
place. As a result, CompuServe commenced suit, seeking, inter alia,
injunctive relief to prevent defendants from sending any further
unsolicited e-mail. The court held that defendants' conduct constituted
the tort of trespass to personal property or chattels. [snip] ...

..the court stated: "To the extent that defendants' multitudinous
electronic mailings demand the disk space and drain the processing power
of plaintiff's computer equipment, those resources are not available to
serve CompuServe subscribers. Therefore, the value of that equipment to
CompuServe is diminished ...". The court further held that the
requirements
of section 218(d) were met by the injury to CompuServe's goodwill and
reputation to with its subscribers, who objected to the receipt of
unsolicited e-mail. ." (source: http://www.phillipsnizer.com/int-
art37.htm)
 (end quote)


In short:
The court also rejected Cyber's claims that CompuServe's decision to
connect to the Internet was an implied invitation to the public to enter
its property for business purposes. The court held that CompuServe's
demand, in October 1995, that Cyber cease the e-mailings was sufficient
withdrawal of any implied invitation. Also:

Other cases brought against Cyber and its president, Sanford Wallace by
Internet service providers have produced similar results. In Concentric
Network Corp. v Wallace, the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California granted Concentric Network (CNC) a permanent
injunction prohibiting Cyber from 1) sending unsolicited e-mail to CNC
subscribers; 2) sending or receiving e-mail via CNC; 3) misrepresenting
that any Cyber e-mail message was sent from or condoned by CNC; and 4)
distributing mailing lists containing the e-mail addresses of CNC
subscribers. In EarthLink v. Cyber Promotions, Inc., the
Los Angeles Superior Court granted EarthLink an injunction prohibiting
Cyber from sending unsolicited e-mail to EarthLink subscribers. The
court determined that Cyber's actions constituted trespass to
EarthLink's
computer systems. (sourse: http://www.info-law.com/lost.html)

*Footnote: SW apparently has not even been able to curb his psychopathic
tendencies to stop spamming (in one way or another). Although he uses
SEVERAL email addresses and posting services, some of his names and
email addresses appear on over *** 70 *** Usenet spam reports!! He is
simply a sick psycho. Whatever spam he no longer engages in is likely
JUST because in recent court case(s), he has been prohibited BY LAW from
continuing his activity.

Regarding this, quoting another source speaking about the
outcome of the case between Spamford and Earthlink: ...
"The decision also prohibits Cyber Promotions and its founder, Sanford
Wallace,
from engaging in a comprehensive list of spam-related activities in the
future." In addition to the $2 million settlement, EarthLink said
Wallace
agreed to be held personally liable for $1 million if he sends spam to
EarthLink members or enables anyone else to spam them. Wallace also
will be
held liable if he violates a number of other restrictions, including
distribution of EarthLink member e-mail addresses.

Since last year, Cyber Promotions has lost legal battles with America
Online
and Bigfoot, a company that provides e-mail addresses.

Cyber Promotions has virtually been out of business since October
when Agis, its backbone Internet service provider, terminated Cyber
Promotions' connection. "
(source: http://money.cnn.com/1998/03/30/technology/earthlink/)

IN SHORT, SANFORD WALLACE IS A WORTHLESS PATHETIC LOSER, who can kiss my
ass. HIS RECENT ACTIVITIES JUST SHOW HIM TO BE A WORSE LOSER THAN ANYONE
WOULD HAVE EXPECTED. MANY WHO THOUGHT SANFORD HAD SOME INTELLECTUAL
CAPACITY NOW SEE HIM AS A PSYCHOPATHIC MORON.

NOW Why Sanford Wallace quit email spam!!:


ONLY ONE REASON: _NOT_ BECAUSE HE IS REFORMED!! **HE IS PROHIBITED BY A
COURT FROM DOING EMAIL SPAM.*** THIS IS THE ONLY REASON THE UNREFORMED
ABUSER HIDES AND ABUSES SECRETLY AND DOES NOT DO EMAIL SPAM. HE STILL
IS AN ABUSER AND A SPAMMER OF SORTS AND HE IS A LOSER PSYCHOPATH WHO
CANNOT
KEEP FROM ABUSING PEOPLE.

SW apparently has not even been able to curb his psychopathic
tendencies to stop spamming (in one way or another). Although he uses
SEVERAL email addresses and posting services, some of his names and
email addresses appear on over *** 70 *** Usenet spam reports!! He is
simply a sick psycho. Whatever spam he no longer engages in is likely
JUST because in recent court case(s), he has been prohibited BY LAW from
continuing his activity.

Regarding this, quoting another source speaking about the
outcome of the case between Spamford and Earthlink: ...
"The decision also prohibits Cyber Promotions and its founder, Sanford
Wallace,
from engaging in a comprehensive list of spam-related activities in the
future." In addition to the $2 million settlement, EarthLink said
Wallace
agreed to be held personally liable for $1 million if he sends spam to
EarthLink members or enables anyone else to spam them. Wallace also
will be
held liable if he violates a number of other restrictions, including
distribution of EarthLink member e-mail addresses.

Since last year, Cyber Promotions has lost legal battles with America
Online
and Bigfoot, a company that provides e-mail addresses.

Cyber Promotions has virtually been out of business since October
when Agis, its backbone Internet service provider, terminated Cyber
Promotions' connection. "
(source: http://money.cnn.com/1998/03/30/technology/earthlink/)

The Internet's most notorious spammer, Sanford Wallace of Cyber
Promotions,
Inc., and other bulk e-mailers have been accused of spoofing addresses,
cloaking headers, and sending out millions of scattershot e-mails for
various
schlocky schemes and products. Now the evidence indicates that the
pathetic
abuser gets his "power trips" kicks from trying to control or extort
people
on Usenet to do what he says or what his friends say (SOooo _low_ has he
apparently sunk for 'power' and 'admiration'). Although (to gain
acceptance
and respectability) this jackass supposedly "turned against spammers"
*, he still
apparently loves to stretch the law and regulations and common sense
decency
_JUST_ to continue to practice ABUSE (or what even the majority of his
sick
supporters on Usenet would _AND HAVE_ labeled abuse). He does this to
people he does not know and for people he does not know. Just does what
he can
get away with for power and praise (from sick misguided others). SICK,
SICK,
SICK, SICKO, PSYCHOPATH.

IN SHORT, SANFORD WALLACE IS A WORTHLESS PATHETIC LOSER, who can kiss my
ass. HIS RECENT ACTIVITIES JUST SHOW HIM TO BE A WORSE LOSER THAN ANYONE
WOULD HAVE EXPECTED. MANY WHO THOUGHT SANFORD HAD SOME INTELLECTUAL
CAPACITY NOW SEE HIM AS A PSYCHOPATHIC MORON.