Subject: Re: Is Bullis More of a Man than "Just Taylor"?

Path: sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!news.alt.net!usenet
From: " LjuteFish" <meat@lart.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.hackers.malicious
Subject: Re: Is Bullis More of a Man than "Just Taylor"?
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:28:02 -0400
Organization: *
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <amfid0$gh2$1@pita.alt.net>
References: <ee8067b3109e65de1f9974500ae5bc14@remailer.privacy.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
X-No-Archive: yes
Xref: sn-us alt.flame:814851 alt.usenet.kooks:478356 alt.hackers.malicious:325580

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:06:04 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous
<nobody@remailer.privacy.at>,wrote:

>At least Bullis can afford to have his name known

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Bullis is the laughing stock of many usenet news groups.
Same with you Brad.